2/13/2023 0 Comments New 3d movies for sale![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() A 55-inch Samsung set ran for $3,300, plus another $150 for each pair of shutter glasses, which were required to watch 3D programming. ![]() Within three months, Panasonic and Samsung had both released their first 3D sets, which had been years in the making. James Cameron had released Avatar a few weeks prior and audiences were captivated by the technology, which was carefully incorporated into the film. To fully understand what went wrong with 3D, it helps to know the technology’s most recent history. While the technology was the darling of marketing departments and heralded at CES as the next big thing, it failed to win some key supporters and failed consumers on several levels, hastening its demise. It didn’t help that most were bulky and had tech issues, as well.īut the fall of 3D goes much deeper than headgear. While less an issue in theaters, home users felt foolish having to wear a special set of glasses to watch TV. The obvious answer, of course, is the glasses. So what happened? Why did 3D fail to catch on? While television manufacturers like Samsung, LG, and Panasonic bet big on the technology - and some top filmmakers, including James Cameron, made a convincing case for it in theaters - it had a lifespan of just seven years. The 3D revolution started a little over a decade ago. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |